Statute of Limitations Substantive not Procedural for Foreign Plaintiff Suing in New Jersey

In an opinion released on June 14, 2013, a panel of New Jersey’s Appellate Division reaffirmed that the question of which state’s statute of limitations should be applied is a substantive, not a procedural, question. The issue arose in one of the many Zometa cases pending in Middlesex County.  In this particular case, the plaintiff, a resident of Virginia, received Zometa in 2002, was diagnosed with osteonecrosis of the jaw in December 2003, and filed suit against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, the manufacturer of Zometa, in…
Continue reading...

FDA-Approved Warnings Insufficient to Start Limitations Clock

In Kendall v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., (February 27, 2012), the New Jersey Supreme Court rejected the argument that an FDA-approved warning – entitled to a “superpresumption” of adequacy under the New Jersey Product Liability Act (PLA) – is automatically sufficient to trigger the start of the statute of limitations.  Under New Jersey’s discovery rule, a person’s two-year time window to file a claim for personal injuries, including product liability claims, does not begin to run until s/he knows, or reasonably should know, of the alleged link…
Continue reading...