Judge Lawrence Stengel of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied summary judgment to the manufacturer of an over-the-counter pain reliever. The manufacturer had sought to dismiss the plaintiff’s fraud and fraudulent misrepresentation claims as preempted by federal law.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates how OTC drugs should be labeled and sold. The Federal Trade Commission regulates whether an OTC drugs advertising is misleading. In the case before Judge Stengel, the OTC manufacturer argued that the fraud claims…
Continue reading...
Preemption
Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, in a 2-1 decision, upheld a trial court ruling dismissing a complaint on the grounds that federal law preempted a plaintiff’s state law breach of warranty and design defect claims. The claims stem from complications following the alleged “off-label” manner of implantation of a spinal bone graft system. Click here for the opinion in Caplinger.
Background
As the majority explained, under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, and the Medical Device…
Continue reading...
Continue reading...
The United States Supreme Court today issued an order declining a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer’s petition for a writ of certiorari. The drug manufacturer had sought to challenge a ruling from the Iowa Supreme Court. In that state court ruling, the Iowa Supreme Court found that the U.S. Supreme Court’s preemption decision in Mensing did not necessarily prohibit failure to update claims. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Mensing held that failure to warn claims brought against generic drug manufactures were preempted.
The plaintiffs’ attorneys have…
Continue reading...
Continue reading...

Continue reading...
Litigation
Continue reading...
- Accutane Bowel Disease Lawsuit Results in $1.5M Verdict in Retrial
- AndroGel Stroke Lawsuit Filed Over Testosterone Gel Side Effects
- GranuFlo and NaturaLyte Use Identification Process Outlined By Judge
- Actos Trial Underway in Las Vegas Over Bladder Cancer in Two Users
- Benicar Lawsuit Filed Over Chronic Diarrhea, Intestinal Problems
- J&J Unit Hit With $3M Jury Verdict in Topamax Row (subscription required)
- Roche Defends Accutane Against New Evidence in NJ Retrial (subscription required)
- Zyprexa Fines Irrelevant in Actos Trial, Eli Lilly Says
Continue reading...
Litigation
Continue reading...
- Mich. Drug Companies Now Less Immune Under Tort Reform (subscription required)
- 9th Circ. To Reconsider Its Remand of Teva Painkiller Suit (subscription required)
- Medtronic Tells 10th Circ. Bone Device Suit is Preempted (subscription required)
- Unilever to Pay $10M Over Hair Loss Tied to Suave Product (subscription required)
- Expert Testimony Barred in Denture-Adhesive Mass Tort (subscription required)
- Roche Looks to Sink $2M Accutane Verdict on Appeal (subscription required)
- Pfizer Says 2nd Circ. Can’t Review Lipitor FCA Suit (subscription
Continue reading...
Litigation
Continue reading...
- Pharma Can Be Liable for Design Negligence: Pa. High Court (subscription required)
- Pfizer Escapes Whistleblower Suit Over Lipitor Marketing (subscription required)
- 23andMe Faces Suit Over Recently Banned DNA Tests (subscription required)
- Claims and Classes in Medical Monitoring Cases (subscription required)
- Boston Scientific Mesh Lawsuit to Move Forward After SOL Challenge
- Motion Filed to Centralize OxyElite Pro Lawsuits in MDL
- 6th Circuit Revives Mylan Wrongful Death Suit (subscription required)
- Jury Clears Abbott In Tainted Formula Injury Suit (subscription required)
- Ethicon
Continue reading...
While Medical Device Amendments of 1976, 21 U.S.C. § 360k(a) provides protection to manufacturers for medical devices approved by the FDA, certain post-FDA approval activities may still give rise to claims. In this recent case, the defendant St. Jude Medical, Inc. moved to dismiss the complaints against it for injuries allegedly resulting from St. Jude Riata leads on implantable cardiac defibrillators where the insulation failed and caused unnecessary shocks in the body. The product was removed from the market in 2010, a warning letter was…
Continue reading...
Continue reading...
Litigation
Continue reading...
- GSK Blasts Appeal Bid in Pa. Paxil Venue Dispute (subscription required)
- Forest Lab’s Lexapro Causes Fatal Birth Defects, Mom Says (subscription required)
- Neutrogena Sunblock Label Suit Not Preempted, Judge Says (subscription required)
- Laser Hair Removal Linked to Risks, Growing Number of Lawsuits
- Fosamax Femur Fracture Lawsuits Continuing, With Several Trials in 2014
- J&J Loses Bid to Nix Levaquin Award in 8th Cir. (subscription required)
- NY High Court Mulls Test for Recall-Related Damages (subscription required)
- Statute of Limitations for Lipitor Diabetes
Continue reading...
The issue of generic-drug preemption continues to be one of the key battlegrounds in pharmaceutical product liability litigation. Recently – as we discussed here – the FDA released a proposed rule that, if adopted, would eliminate the broad preemption of failure-to-warn claims against generic pharmaceutical manufacturers established two years ago by the U.S. Supreme Court in PLIVA v. Mensing.
In the wake of Mensing, multiple courts across the country have taken up efforts by generic pharmaceutical defendants to dismiss failure-to-warn claims, as well…
Continue reading...
Continue reading...